Overpopulation - Revision history

Independent at 14:39, 16 November 2020

2020-11-16T14:39:23Z

Independent: /* Similar to a bomb going off */

2020-10-23T15:29:00Z

Similar to a bomb going off

Independent: /* Listen to the science and scientists */

2020-10-23T15:15:08Z

Listen to the science and scientists

Independent at 17:25, 22 October 2020

2020-10-22T17:25:37Z

Independent: /* Further associated reading */

2020-10-06T20:28:24Z

Further associated reading

Daniel Leech: /* Presentations revolving around Overpopulation */

2019-11-02T12:19:37Z

Presentations revolving around Overpopulation

Daniel Leech: /* Presentations revolving around Overpopulation */

2019-11-02T12:16:16Z

Presentations revolving around Overpopulation

Daniel Leech: /* Presentations revolving around Overpopulation */

2019-11-02T12:12:16Z

Presentations revolving around Overpopulation

Daniel Leech at 12:09, 2 November 2019

2019-11-02T12:09:53Z

Daniel Leech at 12:04, 2 November 2019

2019-11-02T12:04:24Z

@@ Line 97: / Line 97: @@
 </div>
 <br><br>
-<div style="float:right"><br><br>[[File:Sex_education.jpeg|thumb|380px|right|<small><small>1+1=3 ~Human Beings are unlike Octopus, Squid, Salmon and Mayflies whose parents die after the birthing process.</small></small>]]</div>
+<div style="float:right"><br><br>[[File:Sex_education.jpeg|thumb|320px|right|<small><small>1+1=3 ~Human Beings are unlike Octopus, Squid, Salmon and Mayflies whose parents die after the birthing process.</small></small>]]</div>
 <div style="float:left">__TOC__</div>
 <br clear=all>

@@ Line 140: / Line 140: @@
 * [http://www.ufofacts.me.uk/index.php/earth/investigation/overpopulation UFO Facts: Overpopulation (External)] – ''interesting selection of excerpts.''
 <br>
-===Similar to a bomb going off===
+===Explosion breakthrough===
-According to academics who don't know anything about prehistory, around 108 thousand million individuals have ever lived on our planet, assuming we go by their flimsy academically acredited conjecture that history began just after the end of [[Atlantis]], i.e. about 12,000 years ago, or about when anatomically modern humans arrived. This would mean that today’s population size makes up 6.5% of the total number of people ever born, that means it's a population explosion, even if we use the academics counting method which is a thousand million humans short of the actual total alive today. It also means we're genetically modified as a legacy from ancient times, see [[Ageing]], and that our civilisation is not a real civilisation at all unfortunately.
+According to academically accredited individuals who while know lots about the education system know minimally anything about prehistory, say around 108 thousand million individuals have ever lived on our planet. Assuming we did go by their flimsy conjecture that history began just after the end of [[Atlantis]], i.e. last ice age, about 13,000 years ago, or roughly about when the last wave of anatomically modern humans arrived in spaceships, globalised and war. This would mean that today’s population makes up some 6.5% of the total ever born, then it's a population explosion, even if we use the academics counting method, which is a thousand million humans short.
 [[File:Annual-World-Population-since-10-thousand-BCE-for-OWID-800x498.png|700px|thumb|center]]

@@ Line 145: / Line 145: @@
 ===Listen to the science and scientists===
-In reading many conservative critics opinions of Greta Thunberg, many focused on her personal characteristics, rather than message. The message was a very simple one. She asked the leaders of the world and lawmakers to listen to the science and scientists who are in strong, general agreement about the impact of climate change as a result of ‘overpopulation in combination with the local star’s increased activity’. Very few critics actually addressed the subject on which she was speaking. Whether you agree or disagree with the scientist’s message, Greta Thunberg has suffered from the typical stigmatising comments from those who disagree because of her Asperger’s syndrome diagnosis. Some critics, instead of focusing and replying to her message about the threats of climate change as a consequence of ‘human overpopulation in combination with the local star’s increased activity’, chose to focus on the messenger, Greta herself. Calling her “mentally ill,” one religiose critic even went so far as to suggest she was some sort of a parentally-controlled pawn in a vast global conspiracy. It shows a stunning amount of discrimination, stigma, simple lack of respect, and an inability to argue from the facts when someone brings in another person’s mental health status if that status has little to do with the topic at hand. Rodney Lynn for example, a private school headteacher/principal of Coffs Harbour Christian Community Primary School in New South Wales, Australia, branded Greta Thunberg “a little girl with mental problems" in his newsletter to parents, because he’s a Christian religion representative and the parents pay unfortunately to reject the self-responsibility associated with climate change resulting from overpopulation, because they believe in God and worship a book which tells them to in Genesis 9:7 “be fruitful and multiply; spread out across the earth and multiply upon it.”
+Rodney Lynn, a private school headteacher / principal of Coffs Harbour Christian Community Primary School in New South Wales, Australia, branded Greta Thunberg “a little girl with mental problems" in his newsletter to parents, because he’s a Christian religion representative and the parents pay to reject their self-responsibility associated with climate change resulting from overpopulation, because they believe in God and worship a book which tells them to in Genesis 9:7 “be fruitful and multiply; spread out across the earth and multiply upon it.” See Postnatal depression, affects more than 1 in every 10 women within a year of giving birth https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/post-natal-depression/ In reading many conservative critics opinions, many focused on personal characteristics, rather than message. The message was simple. Listen to the science and scientists who are in strong, general agreement about the impact of climate change as a result of ‘overpopulation in combination with the local star’s increased activity’. Very few critics actually address the subject. Some critics, instead of focusing on and replying to the message about the threats of climate change as a consequence of ‘human overpopulation in combination with the local star’s increased activity’, chose to focus on the messenger, Greta herself. Calling her “mentally ill,” one religiose critic even went so far as to suggest she was some sort of a parentally-controlled pawn in a vast global conspiracy. It shows a stunning amount of discrimination, stigma, simple lack of respect, and an inability to argue from the facts when someone brings in another person’s mental health status if that status has little to do with the topic at hand.
 Abandon traditions and listen to the scientists.

@@ Line 267: / Line 267: @@
 : Sample: "the link between overpopulation and climate change, the specifics of the Earth humans exclusivity to holder ...rth, namely in reference to their irresponsible perspective of breeding to overpopulation with all its arising machinations regarding the global destruction of natur..."
 * [[Contact Report 662]]
 : Demagogy is the secret weapon that always brings the most success for liars and slanderers among good believers, because they are tired of thinking or even lazy about thinking and can neither enable themselves nor pick themselves up to get to the bottom of a matter by self-initiative.
 * [[FIGU Bulletin 056]] - ''The World Requires Wise Advisors''
 : Wars are stirred up and led through the state powers who are criminals against humanity, in which criminality and overpopulation know no more bounds, in which nature and the climate are destroyed through the fault of humans, as well as that they themselves are misled through religions and sects, [attention] most urgently required - as never before

@@ Line 294: / Line 294: @@
 * [[Afterlife]]
 : Sample: "Is there a new calculation for reincarnating lives in the present time ? I assume that spirits are coming back into new lives sooner than the standard lifetime plus one half, because of overpopulation. ANSWER: Yes, they are coming back sooner."
 * [[Reincarnation]]
 : Sample: "The resulting effect of overpopulation on reincarnation. It causes a new consciousness and new personality to incarnate with the reincarnation of the spirit-form only a very short time after death and time in the beyond unfortunately."

@@ Line 214: / Line 214: @@
 A: Religious folks say breed freely without limitation, don’t use a condom etc., and they account for some estimate of 70% of all human beings alive on Earth at any one time, controlling the world’s wealth due to their thousands of years legacy of controlling majority, with a very tight close alliance with governments and lawmakers. If we’re going to get overpopulation under control it’s going to be their ideologies which come into focus first.
-:'''Q: But China considers itself an irreligious nation and they’re overpopulated?'''<br>A: True, but a government like China’s is tantamount to not thinking for themselves independently anyway, their government encourages excessive breeding which is tantamount to a religious world view, i.e. they have unexamined beliefs which keep them fettered, passing the blame over to some imaginary force.
+:'''Q: But China considers itself an irreligious nation and they’re overpopulated?'''<br>A: True, but a government like China’s is tantamount to not thinking for themselves independently anyway, their government encourages excessive breeding which is tantamount to a religious world view, i.e. they have unexamined beliefs which keep them fettered, passing the blame over to some imaginary force, indefinite growth, not planning for a future etc.
 <br>

@@ Line 213: / Line 213: @@
 '''Q: How is overpopulation a religion related issue?'''<br>
 A: Religious folks say breed freely without limitation, don’t use a condom etc., and they account for some estimate of 70% of all human beings alive on Earth at any one time, controlling the world’s wealth due to their thousands of years legacy of controlling majority, with a very tight close alliance with governments and lawmakers. If we’re going to get overpopulation under control it’s going to be their ideologies which come into focus first.
 <br>

@@ Line 210: / Line 210: @@
 '''Q: Is overpopulation destroying the planet?'''<br>
 A: No, ‘destroying’ isn’t the right wording, it’s a ‘destruction’ of the environment and ‘damaging’ the planet. But it’s also a destruction and a damaging of many other pertinent things that matter to human beings too, not only the climate and environment. You could say it’s ‘destroying’ rare endangered species, but also that it’s ‘destroying’ the delicate balance of good interpersonal relationships between human beings, possibly one may say that it’s ‘destroying’ the normal pacing of change with regards to the climate i.e. climate change. But no, this community revolves around the truth, [[Earth]], the planet, will continue on for millions of years, assuming we don’t genuinely destroy it, see [[Malona]]. The thing we’re concerned with as [[Human Being]]s is among many things the environment, health of the atmosphere and the life it supports, because as human beings that is what matters to us, we live in that thin filament between the rock and space where air among other things is that we need. At any rate the planet itself changes over long periods of time and is subject to ‘planetary evolution’.
 <br>