Contact Report 207 - Revision history

Earth Human Being at 13:15, 27 September 2021

2021-09-27T13:15:41Z

Earth Human Being at 08:00, 27 September 2021

2021-09-27T08:00:29Z

Earth Human Being at 07:24, 27 September 2021

2021-09-27T07:24:14Z

Earth Human Being at 07:18, 27 September 2021

2021-09-27T07:18:12Z

Earth Human Being at 07:14, 27 September 2021

2021-09-27T07:14:06Z

Earth Human Being at 07:13, 27 September 2021

2021-09-27T07:13:19Z

Show changes

Jamesm: Text replacement - "|- style="line-height:1em"" to "|-"

2021-05-26T18:00:42Z

Text replacement - "|- style="line-height:1em"" to "|-"

Jamesm: Text replacement - "|- | '''Quetzal:''' | '''Quetzal:'''" to "|- style="line-height:1em" |
'''Quetzal:''' |
'''Quetzal:'''"

2021-05-25T11:35:24Z

Show changes

Jamesm: Text replacement - "|
'''Billy:''' | '''Billy:'''" to "|
'''Billy:''' |
'''Billy:'''"

2021-05-25T11:01:56Z

Text replacement - "| '''Billy:''' | '''Billy:'''" to "| '''Billy:''' | '''Billy:'''"

Jamesm: Text replacement - "|- | '''Billy:'''" to "|- style="line-height: 1em" |
'''Billy:'''"

2021-05-25T10:45:41Z

Text replacement - "|- | '''Billy:'''" to "|- style="line-height: 1em" | '''Billy:'''"

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 * Date and time of contact: Monday, 17th March 1986, 09:11 hrs
 * Translator(s): Benjamin Stevens
 * Date of original translation: Monday, 21st December 2009
 * Corrections and improvements made: Joseph Darmanin
 * Contact person(s): [[Quetzal]]

@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
 |-
-| 2. That is correct.
+| 2. That is of correctness.
 | 2. Das ist von Richtigkeit.
 |-

@@ Line 237: / Line 237: @@
 | <br>'''Billy:'''
 |-
-| Then one more question. Initially, it was only Judas Ischarioth who could read and write. But to my knowledge, he also instructed all the other disciples in this art, which wasn’t very popular at that time.
+| Then one more question. Initially, it was only Judas Ischarioth who could read and write. But to my knowledge, he also instructed all the other disciples in this art, which was not very popular at that time.
 | Dann noch eine Frage. Anfänglich war doch nur Judas Ischarioth, der des Lesens und des Schreibens kundig war. Meines Wissens unterrichtete er aber auch alle anderen Jünger in dieser Kunst, die zur damaligen Zeit nicht sehr verbreitet war.
 |-

@@ Line 189: / Line 189: @@
 | <br>'''Billy:'''
 |-
-| That is a word. There probably isn’t any more to be said in addition.
+| That is a word. There probably is not any more to be said in addition.
 | Das ist ein Wort. Mehr ist wohl dazu nicht zu sagen.
 |-
@@ Line 201: / Line 201: @@
 | 25. So sollten nach Möglichkeit alle amerikanischen und englischen Worte und Begriffe aus dem Sprachgebrauch ausgesondert werden, und zwar sowohl im täglichen Gebrauch der Sprache wie auch in den Schulen, in der Politik und Wirtschaft, in den Medien und überall dort, wo englische oder amerikanische Worte und Begriffe usw. in Erscheinung treten.
 |-
-| 26. This should be the duty of every person who speaks the German language because this is, indeed and without any doubt, the most valuable language on Earth.
+| 26. This should be the duty of every human who speaks the German language because this is, indeed and without any doubt, the most valuable language on Earth.
 | 26. Dies sollte die Pflicht sein für jeden Menschen, der die deutsche Sprache spricht, weil diese tatsächlich und ohne jeden Zweifel die wertvollste Sprache auf der Erde ist.
 |-
-| 27. Anyone who doesn’t respond to such extends his/her hand to the Americans for the criminal act of the undermining and eradication of the valuable German language.
+| 27. Anyone who does not respond to such extends his/her hand to the Americans for the criminal act of the undermining and eradication of the valuable German language.
 | 27. Wer dem nicht Folge leistet, reicht den Amerikanern die Hand zum kriminellen Tun der Unterwanderung und Ausrottung der wertvollen deutschen Sprache.
 |-
@@ Line 210: / Line 210: @@
 | <br>'''Billy:'''
 |-
-| With that, everything should probably be clearly explained. Then another question: In the New Testament of the Christian religion, there is talk in the Sermon on the Mount that Jmmanuel should have fed 5,000 human beings, namely through the increase of fish and bread. To my knowledge, that is not true because in this connection, the storage-banks only speak of just 250 human beings who participated in the so-called Sermon on the Mount. Also, these weren’t just men, as it is said in the New Testament, like among other things in John chapter 6 and verse 10; rather, they were mostly women and children who followed Jmmanuel up the mountain, whereby the mountain was truly more of a hill. Thus, the five barley loaves and two fish, which Jmmanuel increased by his powers of consciousness, weren’t provided for 5,000 men but rather only for 250 human beings, respectively women and children, among whom there were only 40 men. Now, my question is this: when was the falsification made in relation to the alleged 5,000 persons?
+| With that, everything should probably be clearly explained. Then another question: In the New Testament of the Christian religion, there is talk in the Sermon on the Mount that Jmmanuel should have fed 5,000 human beings, namely through the increase of fish and bread. To my knowledge, that is not true because in this connection, the storage-banks only speak of just 250 human beings who participated in the so-called Sermon on the Mount. Also, these were not just men, as it is said in the New Testament, like among other things in John chapter 6 and verse 10; rather, they were mostly women and children who followed Jmmanuel up the mountain, whereby the mountain was truly more of a hill. Thus, the five barley loaves and two fish, which Jmmanuel increased by his powers of consciousness, were not provided for 5,000 human beings but rather only for 250 human beings, respectively women and children, among whom there were only 40 men. Now, my question is this: when was the falsification made in relation to the alleged 5,000 persons?
 | Damit dürfte wohl alles klar dargelegt sein. Dann eine weitere Frage: Im Neuen Testament der christlichen Religion ist bei der Bergpredigt die Rede davon, dass Jmmanuel 5000 Menschen genährt haben soll, und zwar durch Vermehrung von Fisch und Brot. Meines Wissens stimmt das nicht, denn die Speicherbänke sprechen diesbezüglich nur gerade von 250 Personen, die an der sogenannten Bergpredigt teilgenommen haben. Es waren auch nicht nur Männer, wie im Neuen Testament gesagt wird, wie unter anderem bei Johannes Kap. 6, Vers 10, sondern es waren hauptsächlich Frauen und Kinder, die Jmmanuel auf den Berg folgten, wobei der Berg wahrheitlich auch nur mehr ein Hügel war. Die fünf Gerstenbrote und die zwei Fische, die Jmmanuel durch seine Bewusstseinskräfte vermehrte, wurden also nicht für 5000 Männer bereitgestellt, sondern nur für 250 Menschen resp. Frauen und Kinder, unter denen sich gerademal 40 Männer befanden. Meine Frage nun dazu: Wann wurde die Verfälschung in bezug auf die angeblich 5000 Personen vorgenommen?
 |-

@@ Line 69: / Line 69: @@
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
 |-
-| 3. That, too, is correct.
+| 3. That is also of correctness.
 | 3. Auch das ist von Richtigkeit.
 |-

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 | Today, I first have a question about your space-time configuration, which is practically another dimension, but which is equally directed to ours and, therefore, is material in an equal way. Our universe is called the DERN universe; what about with our dimension and your dimension, what do you call these?
 | Heute habe ich erst einmal eine Frage hinsichtlich eures Raum-Zeit-Gefüges, das ja praktisch einer anderen Dimension entspricht, die jedoch der unseren gleichgerichtet und also gleichermassen materiell ist. Unser Universum wird DERN-Universum genannt, wie steht es denn mit unserer und eurer Dimension, wie benennt ihr diese?
-|- style="line-height:1em"
+|-
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
@@ Line 47: / Line 47: @@
 | Aha, and these two dimensions, respectively these two different space-time configurations, are materially identical in their buildup and existence?
 | Aha, und diese beiden Dimensionen resp. diese beiden verschiedenen Raum-Zeit-Gefüge sind materiell identisch aufgebaut und existent?
-|- style="line-height:1em"
+|-
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
@@ Line 59: / Line 59: @@
 | And as it stands with the Destroyer, then, it would also have to consist of matter, as this is also existent in our space-time configuration, right?
 | Wie verhält es sich denn mit dem Zerstörer, demnach müsste der ja auch aus Materie bestehen, wie diese auch in unserem Raum-Zeit-Gefüge existent ist, oder?
-|- style="line-height:1em"
+|-
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
@@ Line 71: / Line 71: @@
 | Good. Then another question with regard to Earth’s moon. For some time, scientists have maintained that the Earth’s moon had its origin in or from the Earth. There is the theory that it had been spun off as an entire block of the Earth, while another theory purports that huge dust clouds as well as smaller and larger chunks of rock and earth were spun away from the Earth, and namely by the impact of a massive comet or another planet. The comet or planet involved should have been about as large as the planet Mars, etc. The spun away material should have collected in the course of time and should have developed into the Moon. But in contrast, you explained that the Earth’s moon penetrated from your space-time configuration into ours and then into the SOL system, in which it allowed itself then to be captured by the Earth as a satellite.
 | Gut. Dann eine andere Frage in bezug auf den Erdmond. Seit geraumer Zeit behaupten Wissenschaftler, dass der Erdmond seinen Ursprung in oder von der Erde habe. Dabei gibt es die Theorie, dass er als gesamter Block von der Erde weggeschleudert worden sei, während eine andere Theorie besagt, dass gewaltige Staubwolken sowie kleinere und grössere Gesteins- und Erdbrocken von der Erde weggeschleudert worden seien, und zwar durch den Einschlag eines gewaltigen Kometen oder eines anderen Planeten. Der Komet oder Planet soll dabei in etwa so gross gewesen sein wie der Planet Mars usw. Das weggeschleuderte Material soll sich im Laufe der Zeit gesammelt und zum Mond entwickelt haben. Im Gegensatz dazu habt ihr aber erklärt, dass der Erdmond aus eurem Raum-Zeit-Gefüge in das unsere und dann in das SOL-System eingedrungen sei, in dem er sich dann von der Erde als Trabant einfangen liess.
-|- style="line-height:1em"
+|-
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
@@ Line 86: / Line 86: @@
 | You’ve already explained this to me before. But how is it with the matter of the Moon? Of what kind is it?
 | Das habt ihr mir schon früher erklärt. Wie steht es aber mit der Mondmaterie? Welcher Art ist die?
-|- style="line-height:1em"
+|-
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
@@ Line 104: / Line 104: @@
 | Then quite frankly, to them, one will barely be able to set the truth as a counterargument, for the earthly scientists are sufficiently and only too well known for their narrow-mindedness.
 | Dem wird dann wohl kaum die Wahrheit entgegenzusetzen sein, denn die irdischen Wissenschaftler sind für ihre Borniertheit bestens und zur Genüge bekannt.
-|- style="line-height:1em"
+|-
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
@@ Line 116: / Line 116: @@
 | Do you know when that will be?
 | Weisst du, wann das sein wird?
-|- style="line-height:1em"
+|-
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
@@ Line 131: / Line 131: @@
 | Then it will be so after the turn of the millennium.
 | Dann wird es also nach dem Jahrtausendwechsel sein.
-|- style="line-height:1em"
+|-
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
@@ Line 143: / Line 143: @@
 | Another question: Semjase once told me that the Americans desperately strive to undermine the German language, in order to destroy it, make it disappear, and eradicate it. This should be the case since the Second World War. Can you tell me something about this?
 | Eine andere Frage: Semjase sagte mir einmal, dass die Amerikaner sich krampfhaft darum bemühen, die deutsche Sprache zu unterwandern, um sie zu zerstören, zum Verschwinden zu bringen und auszurotten. Das soll so sein seit dem Zweiten Weltkrieg. Kannst du mir etwas dazu sagen?
-|- style="line-height:1em"
+|-
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
@@ Line 185: / Line 185: @@
 | That is a word. There probably isn’t any more to be said in addition.
 | Das ist ein Wort. Mehr ist wohl dazu nicht zu sagen.
-|- style="line-height:1em"
+|-
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
@@ Line 206: / Line 206: @@
 | With that, everything should probably be clearly explained. Then another question: In the New Testament of the Christian religion, there is talk in the Sermon on the Mount that Jmmanuel should have fed 5,000 human beings, namely through the increase of fish and bread. To my knowledge, that is not true because in this connection, the storage-banks only speak of just 250 human beings who participated in the so-called Sermon on the Mount. Also, these weren’t just men, as it is said in the New Testament, like among other things in John chapter 6 and verse 10; rather, they were mostly women and children who followed Jmmanuel up the mountain, whereby the mountain was truly more of a hill. Thus, the five barley loaves and two fish, which Jmmanuel increased by his powers of consciousness, weren’t provided for 5,000 men but rather only for 250 human beings, respectively women and children, among whom there were only 40 men. Now, my question is this: when was the falsification made in relation to the alleged 5,000 persons?
 | Damit dürfte wohl alles klar dargelegt sein. Dann eine weitere Frage: Im Neuen Testament der christlichen Religion ist bei der Bergpredigt die Rede davon, dass Jmmanuel 5000 Menschen genährt haben soll, und zwar durch Vermehrung von Fisch und Brot. Meines Wissens stimmt das nicht, denn die Speicherbänke sprechen diesbezüglich nur gerade von 250 Personen, die an der sogenannten Bergpredigt teilgenommen haben. Es waren auch nicht nur Männer, wie im Neuen Testament gesagt wird, wie unter anderem bei Johannes Kap. 6, Vers 10, sondern es waren hauptsächlich Frauen und Kinder, die Jmmanuel auf den Berg folgten, wobei der Berg wahrheitlich auch nur mehr ein Hügel war. Die fünf Gerstenbrote und die zwei Fische, die Jmmanuel durch seine Bewusstseinskräfte vermehrte, wurden also nicht für 5000 Männer bereitgestellt, sondern nur für 250 Menschen resp. Frauen und Kinder, unter denen sich gerademal 40 Männer befanden. Meine Frage nun dazu: Wann wurde die Verfälschung in bezug auf die angeblich 5000 Personen vorgenommen?
-|- style="line-height:1em"
+|-
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
@@ Line 218: / Line 218: @@
 | So it was still in Jmmanuel’s lifetime.
 | Also war es noch zu Jmmanuels Lebzeit.
-|- style="line-height:1em"
+|-
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
@@ Line 233: / Line 233: @@
 | Then one more question. Initially, it was only Judas Ischarioth who could read and write. But to my knowledge, he also instructed all the other disciples in this art, which wasn’t very popular at that time.
 | Dann noch eine Frage. Anfänglich war doch nur Judas Ischarioth, der des Lesens und des Schreibens kundig war. Meines Wissens unterrichtete er aber auch alle anderen Jünger in dieser Kunst, die zur damaligen Zeit nicht sehr verbreitet war.
-|- style="line-height:1em"
+|-
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''
 | <br>'''Quetzal:'''

@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 |- style="line-height: 1em"
 | <br>'''Billy:'''
-| '''Billy:'''
+| <br>'''Billy:'''
 |-
 | Today, I first have a question about your space-time configuration, which is practically another dimension, but which is equally directed to ours and, therefore, is material in an equal way. Our universe is called the DERN universe; what about with our dimension and your dimension, what do you call these?
@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
 |- style="line-height: 1em"
 | <br>'''Billy:'''
-| '''Billy:'''
+| <br>'''Billy:'''
 |-
 | Aha, and these two dimensions, respectively these two different space-time configurations, are materially identical in their buildup and existence?
@@ Line 55: / Line 55: @@
 |- style="line-height: 1em"
 | <br>'''Billy:'''
-| '''Billy:'''
+| <br>'''Billy:'''
 |-
 | And as it stands with the Destroyer, then, it would also have to consist of matter, as this is also existent in our space-time configuration, right?
@@ Line 67: / Line 67: @@
 |- style="line-height: 1em"
 | <br>'''Billy:'''
-| '''Billy:'''
+| <br>'''Billy:'''
 |-
 | Good. Then another question with regard to Earth’s moon. For some time, scientists have maintained that the Earth’s moon had its origin in or from the Earth. There is the theory that it had been spun off as an entire block of the Earth, while another theory purports that huge dust clouds as well as smaller and larger chunks of rock and earth were spun away from the Earth, and namely by the impact of a massive comet or another planet. The comet or planet involved should have been about as large as the planet Mars, etc. The spun away material should have collected in the course of time and should have developed into the Moon. But in contrast, you explained that the Earth’s moon penetrated from your space-time configuration into ours and then into the SOL system, in which it allowed itself then to be captured by the Earth as a satellite.
@@ Line 82: / Line 82: @@
 |- style="line-height: 1em"
 | <br>'''Billy:'''
-| '''Billy:'''
+| <br>'''Billy:'''
 |-
 | You’ve already explained this to me before. But how is it with the matter of the Moon? Of what kind is it?
@@ Line 100: / Line 100: @@
 |- style="line-height: 1em"
 | <br>'''Billy:'''
-| '''Billy:'''
+| <br>'''Billy:'''
 |-
 | Then quite frankly, to them, one will barely be able to set the truth as a counterargument, for the earthly scientists are sufficiently and only too well known for their narrow-mindedness.
@@ Line 112: / Line 112: @@
 |- style="line-height: 1em"
 | <br>'''Billy:'''
-| '''Billy:'''
+| <br>'''Billy:'''
 |-
 | Do you know when that will be?
@@ Line 127: / Line 127: @@
 |- style="line-height: 1em"
 | <br>'''Billy:'''
-| '''Billy:'''
+| <br>'''Billy:'''
 |-
 | Then it will be so after the turn of the millennium.
@@ Line 139: / Line 139: @@
 |- style="line-height: 1em"
 | <br>'''Billy:'''
-| '''Billy:'''
+| <br>'''Billy:'''
 |-
 | Another question: Semjase once told me that the Americans desperately strive to undermine the German language, in order to destroy it, make it disappear, and eradicate it. This should be the case since the Second World War. Can you tell me something about this?
@@ Line 181: / Line 181: @@
 |- style="line-height: 1em"
 | <br>'''Billy:'''
-| '''Billy:'''
+| <br>'''Billy:'''
 |-
 | That is a word. There probably isn’t any more to be said in addition.
@@ Line 202: / Line 202: @@
 |- style="line-height: 1em"
 | <br>'''Billy:'''
-| '''Billy:'''
+| <br>'''Billy:'''
 |-
 | With that, everything should probably be clearly explained. Then another question: In the New Testament of the Christian religion, there is talk in the Sermon on the Mount that Jmmanuel should have fed 5,000 human beings, namely through the increase of fish and bread. To my knowledge, that is not true because in this connection, the storage-banks only speak of just 250 human beings who participated in the so-called Sermon on the Mount. Also, these weren’t just men, as it is said in the New Testament, like among other things in John chapter 6 and verse 10; rather, they were mostly women and children who followed Jmmanuel up the mountain, whereby the mountain was truly more of a hill. Thus, the five barley loaves and two fish, which Jmmanuel increased by his powers of consciousness, weren’t provided for 5,000 men but rather only for 250 human beings, respectively women and children, among whom there were only 40 men. Now, my question is this: when was the falsification made in relation to the alleged 5,000 persons?
@@ Line 214: / Line 214: @@
 |- style="line-height: 1em"
 | <br>'''Billy:'''
-| '''Billy:'''
+| <br>'''Billy:'''
 |-
 | So it was still in Jmmanuel’s lifetime.
@@ Line 229: / Line 229: @@
 |- style="line-height: 1em"
 | <br>'''Billy:'''
-| '''Billy:'''
+| <br>'''Billy:'''
 |-
 | Then one more question. Initially, it was only Judas Ischarioth who could read and write. But to my knowledge, he also instructed all the other disciples in this art, which wasn’t very popular at that time.
@@ Line 250: / Line 250: @@
 |- style="line-height: 1em"
 | <br>'''Billy:'''
-| '''Billy:'''
+| <br>'''Billy:'''
 |-
 | Bye then. Until we meet again.